In this article
A team does not always need another platform. Sometimes it needs one missing connection: an enquiry that arrives with the right context, a handoff that keeps its owner, or a project decision that stops disappearing into chat.
AI-assisted development makes it practical to test a small tool around that friction. The useful starting point is the business process, not a list of features.
Find the expensive workaround
Look for a task people repeatedly copy, chase, or reconstruct. For example, a consultant receives enquiries by email, asks the same qualifying questions, then rebuilds the answers in a project brief.
A first tool could collect the relevant answers and create a private brief for review. It does not need automated proposals, payments, or a complex CRM integration on day one.
Before building, observe several real enquiries. Which information changes the next decision? Which questions create unnecessary friction? Use that evidence to choose the fields.
Give the AI a business brief
In ChatGPT Work or Codex, use your preferred Astra Extra High setup where available and give it this assignment:
Create a focused client-intake tool. Help a visitor describe the business problem, desired outcome, current process, and timing. Create a private GitHub repository under my account if authorized. Prepare a Railway deployment and Supabase storage with an authenticated internal review screen. Do not collect payment or send proposals. Define the acceptance criteria before implementation. Explain missing access rather than claiming it is connected.
Include the repository owner, desired name, brand guidelines, and the existing website context. Use fictional submissions until the data access and retention choices are settled.
Keep the architecture understandable
Use GitHub for code history, Railway for the deployed application, and Supabase for the records and access model. Ask the agent to explain how an enquiry moves from the form to the review screen.
Keep the public submission route separate from permission to read submissions. Add validation and abuse controls. Protect the internal review area, and keep server credentials out of browser code and the repository.
After connecting Railway to the intended GitHub branch, supply the required environment variables through the hosting settings. Request a deployment record and a public URL, then test the actual page.
Measure the handoff, not just the form
A confirmation screen should appear only after the submission has been stored successfully. If you add email notifications, verify delivery separately; database persistence does not prove an email arrived.
Test a complete enquiry, an incomplete enquiry, a double click, and a temporary failure. Confirm that visitors cannot read other submissions. Have a colleague find the new enquiry and explain the next action without your help.
For a small pilot, measure the time from enquiry to usable brief, missing-information follow-ups, and whether a clear owner takes the next step. Compare with the existing process. Do not claim revenue improvement from a nicer form alone.
Decide whether to expand
If the tool improves the handoff, connect it to the next system with clear ownership and failure reporting. If the problem was actually an unclear offer, fix the offer before adding automation.
Explore Railway through our referral link. If you want help identifying and implementing the highest-value workflow, bring the process and its current friction to Waymaker Agency.
Sources
Want this applied to your business? The Growth Fix is one fixed-price session to find where your customers drop off and fix the part that matters most.
