A competitor's estimated traffic is a clue about distribution, not a copy of its bank statement. A specialist consultancy with modest traffic can outperform a large publication at winning the right accounts. Your research should explain how prospective buyers find help, what they expect, and where your business could contribute something more useful.
Build a comparison set around the buying decision
Choose direct service competitors, alternative ways to solve the problem, and publishers that compete for the same searches. A CRM consultant may compete with another consultancy for implementation work, with software documentation for self-service answers, and with a trade publication for attention. Label those roles rather than comparing every domain as the same business model.
Record the domain, country, device coverage, date range and whether you examined an entire site, subdomain or page. Keep geography and periods consistent. A global tool's annual traffic estimate is not comparable with a local firm's monthly search estimate. Save the observation date because tools revise their models and datasets.
Know what the tools can and cannot tell you
Similarweb combines several data sources into modeled traffic and engagement estimates. Ahrefs' organic-traffic figure estimates search visits from rankings, search volumes and click assumptions. These are different constructs. Neither grants access to a competitor's private analytics, lead quality, margins or sales conversion. Small domains and narrow segments may have limited coverage. “No data” is not evidence of no visitors.
Use estimates directionally: which topics or pages appear important, which channels may contribute, and whether a change is large enough to investigate. Compare a few tools only when their definitions are clear. Averaging incompatible estimates does not turn them into truth.
Inspect the journey behind a popular page
- What question does the page answer, and which buyer is likely to ask it?
- Does the next step match the question: a template, consultation, demonstration or purchase?
- What evidence supports the promise, and what remains vague?
- Are the contact path, mobile experience and response expectations clear?
- What original resource could your team produce from expertise it actually has?
For example, a competitor may attract searches for “proposal approval process.” A generic article could serve students, employees and buyers alike. A practical approval checklist for five-person consultancies may reach fewer people but align more closely with your service. That is a hypothesis to test, not proof that a narrower page will convert.
Turn the research into an opportunity brief
Use a compact table with the query or topic, observed page, estimated demand signal, audience fit, evidence gap, proposed resource and next action. Separate observation from interpretation. “This page ranks for several related queries” is an observation from a tool; “buyers are underserved” is an interpretation requiring further evidence.
Validate the interpretation through sales questions, relevant community discussions and customer conversations. Do not submit fake inquiries, impersonate a buyer or collect private competitor data. Public pages, public advertisements and ordinary tool access are enough for a useful first analysis.
Measure your own test
Publish one differentiated resource, connect it to an appropriate service page, and record the baseline. Monitor query visibility, relevant visits, useful actions and qualified inquiries over a suitable window. Search demand can take time to show, so agree on an effort limit and review schedule rather than promising an immediate ranking. Your decision should rest on evidence from your own audience and delivery model, with competitor estimates serving as context.
Sources and useful references
Keep learning
Want this applied to your business? The Growth Fix is one fixed-price session to find where your customers drop off and fix the part that matters most.
